the Bishkek-formulation
i = ((c – [v])/c)x v<c, i = interaction, influence
m
is matter, without NN = m
it is possible to understand more.
x = 1, see later
NN = m/i
,, NN = mass appearance
,, v =
velocity of matter, particles
X = 1 à
i = 1 – [v]/c = the (Bishkek) influence
The
Bishkek-formulation is for the Eleonorazone
Index
--1-- introduction
around the Bishkek-formulation and Eleonora-theory
--2-- the
Bishkek formulation and Eleonora theory supplement
Einstein
--3-- the
Bishkek-formulation
--4-- the
tangential and radial speed of everthing and in
everything
--5-- the
foam-like appearance of the cosmos
--6-- v and
i
--7-- tangential,
radial, internal and external speed and the big-bang appearance
--8-- the
number of basic dimensions; 3 or 2 or
1 ???
--9-- productive
use of extensive modeling with physics and mathematics :
--10-- the Eleonorazone, infinite „density“ and time
--11-- more about the Eleozone.
--12-- i
= ((c – [v])/c)x à i = 1 – [v]/c
--13-- the black holes
recycle from the Newtonzone to the Eleonorazone
--14-- the
“Bishkek-formula and Eleonorazone” confirm God
--15-- around the autor of the Bishkek-formulation and Eleonora-theory
--1-- introduction around the
Bishkek-formulation and Eleonora-theory
The “Bishkek-formulation” is a simplified formulation, dating from Feb 22nd
2010, of the relativity and the universe. Though the autor
has never been granted a PhD degree, the autor supposes
that it might be of some value for the science of didactics of theoretical
(fundamental) physics and astrophysics and in this way indirectly for the
science of theoretical (fundamental) physics and astrophysics. It might be an
example of education with a simplified explanation that is a starter on the way
to real science. It might introduce potential students to the understanding of
the relativity and on the route towards the real science of theoretical astrophysics
and relativity-physics.
Do people start to learn speaking with the word =mama= or with the word
==Bundesverfassungsrichterbefangenheitsbesorgnissgründen-beseitigungsverfahrenspflichtvernachlässigungs-eurorettungssteuerparadiesensubventionierungsverträgen-beurteilungsunbefangenheitssicherungs-grundrechtenschutzvernachlässigungsbesorgnisse==?
The Bishkek-formulation manages without complicated mathematics and is therefore
easier to be understood than Einsteins
field equations, on the theories of Lorentz, Poincare and others. The
Bishkek-formulation could be understood by a larger number of people who are
interested in the relativity and astrophysics. It could create a significantly wider
embedded support in the society for these fields of science.
All the well-known observations fit in the simplified formulation of the relativity
and the universe, the “Bishkek-formulation”. The recent observations that
neutrino’s travel slightly faster than light-particles also fit in, though also
neutrino’s should be slightly slower than c-absolute.
The recent “Delft-observations” also fit in. The Bishkek-formulation includes
the “gravitational” field as fundamental / basic and together with the
observations it leads to the conclusion that the “velocity” of the
“gravitational” field is c-absolute. Up till today the
presentation of the Bishkek-formulation includes the inspiring suggestion that
there might be particles with a velocity higher than c-absolute. However, the Bishkek-formulation
includes the explanation that this is impossible and that any particle, with
all particles being clusters of rotating smaller particles, suffers an
asymptotic occurrence of distortion related to the asymptotic increase of its
velocity towards c-absolute. The Bishkek-formulation also includes the
explanation for the “energy-emission” by “black-holes” along their rotational
axis. The emission is elementary for the continuation of their accumulation and
rotation, and their vectored gravitational influence as well as its variation
along time e.g. gravitational waves. The conclusion might be that there exists
no whatever static area, no whatever area without any kind of flux and
gravitational waves, though it has to be admitted that “the action” and an
interesting source of gravitational waves is where two black holes are slinging
each other.
The Bishkek-formulation also includes, that the effects of the c-absolute
“velocity” of “gravitational” fields include infinite space for philosophical
discussions about an infinite number of parallel universes. The
Bishkek-formulation makes it easier to understand that anything with a higher
“velocity” than c-absolute, can’t be observed by us. It is more difficult to
understand that an universe with a slower “velocity” of its “gravitational”
field than c-absolute, can neither be observed by us. Alternate, it can be concluded
that the universe with our c-absolute is the only one with an existence that we
can observe. However, that would include the impossible implication that our
universe consists with a discrete value, the discrete value c-absolute.
Homing our thoughts in our universe, it might be concluded that the
importance of the understanding of gravitational waves together with the
relativity, is increasing with the increasing energy-density (-variations) of
our technological developments. The understanding of the astronomical
gravitational waves might support the understanding of the influences in the nanoworld. Not thermonuclear fusion is to be mentioned in
particular in this regard but the physical downsizing of computing, storage and
transmission of data as well as nanomechanics, the application of nanoparticulates and dna/rna (molecular storage of data), nano-optics, etc. It is
easy to understand that the GP gravitational pulse of a neutrino could disturb
some single switches of a quantum computer. However, gravitational waves exert
influence and they can disturb everything, not only mass but also photons and
electromagnetic waves, that on their turn directly or indirectly generate
gravitational waves. The understanding of gravitational waves together with the
understanding of the relativity is becoming elementary for the further
proceedings in the understanding, managing and fine-tuning / optimizing in
regard to the downsizing of all kind of processing. The research into gravitational
waves and the relativity implies much more than research into abstract subjects
and is essential for the possible leaps forward in the technology with very
valuable practical applications.
--2-- the Bishkek formulation and Eleonora theory
supplement Einstein
Do the Bishkek formulation and the Eleonora
theory oppose “Einstein’s” theories etc. ?
They do not oppose them and very sure do not replace those of the greatest
scientist Tesla.
Poincare and Lorentz “established bridges wide rivers”, as did Brunel in
reality, together with many other scientist who have been inspired by them and
each other.
The Bishkek-formulation and the Eleozone-“theory”
would not be possible, without the preceedings.
They inspired many scientists, each to realize difficult scientific achievments that are much more difficult than the
establishment of the Bishkek formulation and the Eleozone
theory together. Lorentz established the basic formulations on the relativity
theory that Poincare started. Einstein managed to mystify with the field equiations. Who is or are the slavonic
women and men who (together with Einstein) developed the field equiations that have been tagged solely with the name
Einstein? The field equations provoked many scientists to expand their math-knowledge.
That supported them to proceed on physics.
The Bishkek formulation and the Eleozone theory
are suppletions to the relativity and quantum
theories like those are suppletions to Newton,
Brunel, others and Tesla, the greatest scientist.
--3-- the Bishkek-formulation
i = 1 – [v]/c v<c
i = interaction, influence
m is matter, without
NN = m it is possible to
understand more. Probably x = 1
NN = m/i
,, NN = mass appearance
,, v =
velocity of matter, particles
X = 1 à
i = 1 – [v]/c = the (Bishkek) influence
v = c seems
impossible because v = a x t
and a = i * ? and
i = 0 if v = c
Also if v
= c then c - v = 0
if v > c then
c – v < 0 There is no
relative distance
over that i
can exert, given c is
the velocity of i
Also if v >=
c it can not
be observed by observer A
It seems the velocity of i
is c The bubble of i
around matter acts with velocity
c
Matter with v > c
would escape the bubble of influence around observer A
If v>= c
then it escapes the bubble of
influence around A and also cont be observed
in A
It seems that velocity of i
is c and
i needs relative distance
rather than time
i seems to need more time when c – v
decreases and time seems to slow
down
and i
seems to decrease with
c – v So there is a
relativity among all with i
An absolute speed of v = c
is theoretical because
absolute c is an absolute number.
An absolute number has zero
hence infinite narrow bandwidth and so can not be
equalized.
Absolute v > c
if existent, not for us because we can not
observe.
If from our position A
particle B with speed in direction 1 VB1
then can ? (=no)
B emit a particle D
with a speed in direction 1 of VD1
so then possible VB1 + VD1 >
C and VB1 + VC1 + VF1
> C etc.
However we can not
observe VD1 – A > C
and VF1 - A > C
etc.
because then particles,
radiation, emitted from D or
F etc. will never reach us.
model descriptions of
influence i is possible also with v > c
v of i
= c So i
between A and B needs more time and
i seems weaker
when VB from A increases.
If (VD from
A) > C then the influence is
indirect; A influences B and B
influences D.
--4-- the tangential and radial speed of everthing
and in everything
There are two main directions of speed; tangential and radial.
There are two main appearances of
matter and particles; lumps and clusters
tangentials .
The earth, a stone and a grain
are lumps.
The solar system and atoms are
clusters of particles with tangential speed among each other.
The tangential speed causes
matter to occupy volume. That is also
for lumps.
The atoms in the lumps take
volume because of the tangential speed of particles in the atoms.
The tangential movement of
particles inside particles also cause magnetic
attraction
between the particles. The tangential speed is in balance with
attraction.
Matter has two complementarily
components; i and
v i is observed as gravity
v is
l/t So i
and m and
l and t
are related.
In a particle the tangential
speed is in balance with i.
The core of particles tends to be
much more dense then the rest.
When it contains less tangential
speed the mass occupies less space, is more condensed.
During time particles radiate,
emit, particles with a high radial speed.
The emitted particles tend to
have a higher v/m and
v/i than average in the emitter.
Inside the emitting
cluster,particle m/v
and i/v increase during time,
its capacity to emit and occupy
space decreases,
its contracting,immitting,attracting capacity increases.
Black holes are also in balance,
with a very high internal m/v and
i/v
Black holes have a high immitance to emittance ratio, at
the time they are black holes.
Note about time-relativity
Its according to the Bishkek formel that
travelers age less. The influence – i - becomes less when the – v – goes nearer
to – c - and the time seems to be
slower.
It needs influence for aging. Aging takes more time with less influence,
eg, regarded with the rate of aging less time seems
to have passed, eg time seems to have slowed.
--5-- the foam-like appearance of the cosmos
The total cosmos rather a foam like than a big
bang the 14 billion years we observe.
Emitted particles, radiation,
undergo influence - i - from the matter in the space they travel.
This causes speed in a specific
direction to average.
High speed particles, radiation,
are slowed down by slower matter in the space they travel.
So the longer radiation is on the
way the more energy it loses; red
shift.
The red shift of light from far
away cosmos is because of this.
In general The red shift is not
because its source is moving fast away.
All cosmos does not originate
from one big bang.
The cosmos is a huge soup with variation in
distribution, of –matter-, - i -
and - v -
a variation in distribution in
space as well as time.
Because the variation in
distribution there are always flows.
In the cosmos there are spherical
regions with high i/v in an era of contraction
and spherical regions with
high v/i that are in an era of expansion.
Where spheres of expansion meet,
there are zones with higher density, like in foam. In the meeting zone matter with opposite velocity
eliminates each others speed, slows down, accumulates
in the meeting zone. To some extent it is the same where spheres of contraction
meet, also because those zones are less vacuumed by the gravity centre.
The predominant look-a-like
of the cosmos is foam.
Between a centre
of expansion and contraction there can be a gradient. In a model with more than
three dimensions, the phenomena that occur can be described with a saddle
shaped surface.
--6-- v and i
Potential energy is with the i
component of matter
Radiation energy is with the v
component of matter
Nihilation
of i
doest not occur, only redistribution of i
and v among matter.
Partial conversion among E=mc2 is possible but total conversion is
asymptotic impossible.
For conversion among E=mc2 particles have to emit (smaller) particles
with a higher v/i
There is no mechanism known that
particles just split up in particles with opposite v = c
With conversion among E=mc2 redistribution of i
and v among matter occur.
The emitted particles are smaller
with a higher v/i leaving the rest with a lower v/i
Lower v/i
higher i/v makes it less capable to emit.
So emission and so conversion among E=mc2 is an asymptotic process.
It is questionable that conv.
among E=mc2 is possible of
more than half of the involved mass.
There is much variation among
distribution v/i inside a given area, an atom, a galaxy,
space.
Each area has an average v/i
inside.
We can only calculate the
average v/m of given particles inside a given area, an
atom.
However we do not know the inside
of the smallest particles so can not calculate v/m
inside.
It is impossible to get the
complete picture of v/i inside any given area.
E=mc2 is not in
conflict with E=mv2/2. With E=mv2/2 only the smaller mass with the higher speed
is considered. In the action and reaction mechanism the mass that launches the
other mass remains with a lower speed with E=mv2/2 in opposite direction.
--7-- tangential, radial, internal and external speed and the big-bang
appearance
In a particle we can see smaller
particles with tangential velocity among each other.
If the internal tangential speeds
are less the particle can be more condensed.
The more condensed a particle is
and the higher the external speed the better it can penetrate.
If stated that radiations have
the same speed it means that, in the case that the particles of the
radiation have higher energy, it
has to be that the particles have higher mass appearance NN.
NN is asymptotic, so near c a
tiny increase of v towards
c gives a huge increase of
NN.
It seems that 14 billion lightyears away has a higher speed/redshift than say 8
billion away.
It seems logic because how else
it further away than the cosmos closer to the big bang origin.
However the radiation can also
have been slowed down more on the way to our observation.
In a sphere of expansion, at any
given time after the originating big bang, the more away from the centre the higher outward speed the particles have, that is
why they are more away from the centre. All
originated from the centre big bang sphere. In that
sphere was an average v/i After redistribution by the big bang the
outward zones have a higher v/i and the centre a
lower v/i
In the centre zones during time
v is more slowed down by i
than in the outer zones. The difference of speed in the inner and outer
zones becomes more pronounced during time. The difference in speed will appear
larger to an observer in the centre because the
slowing down of radiation on the way will cause more red shift. And this
slowing down and red shift to the observer depends on time and distance but
also depends on the distribution of concentration and speed of the matter in
the space, also that between source and observer. It also depends on the
positions relative to gravity centers. The attraction by gravity centers will
partially compensate the slow down by the matter that the radiation passes. So
what we observe about the cosmos is the result of a very complex distortion. Its very interesting and the improvement of the calculation
of the distortion will never be finished and neither for the microcosmos.
Will the velocity of the more outer zones increase during time because
blowing radiation from les outer zones ? During some time, short or long. It
depends on the balance between the influence from the gravity center and
outside mass and radiation intensity. At the outer zones the influence from the
gravity center is low due to the large distance and the high outward velocity
of the outer zones. However the radiation is very diluted. The sphere surface
of the outer zones is very large. If for of radiation from C to F v > c
,relative to A, then the radiation can blow F very well. However, then
of i
from C to F also v > c
,relative to A. Then i of the slower C on F can also very well slow
F down. Its sure that the velocity
increases during some time. That time may be different for every zone. Before
the big bang there is no outward velocity and after the big bang there is
outward velocity. So during some time the velocity increases. There is
distribution of matter, velocity and increase, a distribution over time and
distance. It is very complex to calculate the distribution. The redshift of
radiation due to slowing down causes the calculations, from the observations,
again to be more complex.
Understanding macrocosmos can help
understanding microcosmos and vice versa.
--8-- is the number of basic dimensions; 3 or 2 or 1
???
The everything consists of maximum 3 basic dimension. That
is also in E=mc2
Matter is the one dimension, time
and distance are the two other.
Its discussible that time and
distance are two dimensions or two components of one basic.
Matter m
has two complementary appearance forms
i and v
with i = 1 – [v]/c
the more v
the less i With
v = c then would i = 0
and if v = 0 would
i = 1
if i = 0
and v = c all the matter m would be what is observed
as energy, according E=mc2
if v = 0
and i = 1 all the matter m
would be what is observed as
mass NN {m}
With v
and time t distance l is
created or with
v and distance
l time t is
created,
through this, it is not 3 but 2 basic dimensions.
However, with
t and l
being components of v and
v and i
being appearances of m it
can be stated there is only one
basic dimension, being m
The everything consists of only
matter m ,in the appearances of m
Another claim; the two appearances i
and v of matter
m are the two basic dimensions.
It seems that, if i and v would mitigate each other, the result would be
zero.
It can be claimed that matter m is only appearance, in i and v splitting from zero.
With this it can be claimed that
everything just appeared out of zero,
with a variation of distribution
over time and space.
This description meets less
objections than the big bang theory (that everything started with a big bang). It can be that the 14 billion light-years we
observe, originate from a big bang of a big black hole. However it is more
probable that there is more than just this quantity of matter and time, because
why would it be this quantity and not more or less.
With claiming there is only one basic dimension m ,it is
easier to understand the statement that everything appeared out of nothing, zero
at zero space and time, one single point of time and space. Because before
there was also no distance, no space, there were no other points in space and
time and there is no question of choice of what point in space and time. With
that, everything is only relative to itself, the amount of matter and time and c and,
through m and t over c , the amount of distance, space. It is the same whatever large or small it is
named, it is just there. c can be
named fast or slow, it is just c , it is
just there. 14 billion lightyears time and distance
and the amount of matter in it, can be named large or small, it is just there.
So there can as well be a trillion or a zillion times more, infinite more
outside our observations.
The origin can never be revealed,
neither all details, neither the complete picture.
CERN will only show more details
about distribution, relations and smaller particles.
{Two well known (related)
formula} F = G M1M2/ r2 F = mv2/r
--9-- productive use of extensive modeling with
physics and mathematics :
A 9 dimensional situation, a
matrix of complex differential equations,
is not just only something for
mathematical theory but also for reality;
location 3 dim, specific mass dim
4, temperature dim 5, gives thermal energy
adding dim 6 specific
conductivity, specific reactivity dim 7, specific exergy
dim 8, and time dimension 9, gives
delta T.
Understanding of complex
multidimensional models can help calculations for any object from micro chip to nuclear power station and from human body to
earth atmosphere.
Work of big teams can help to
improve the design and operation of anything man made; micro
chip, computer, infrastructure network, car, power plant. The
developments are far from finished.
with regards to the kyrgyz, technical,
universities
i = 1 – [v]/c v<c i = interaction, influence
m is matter, without
NN = m it is possible to
understand more.
NN = m/i ,,
NN = mass appearance ,, v = velocity of matter, particles
the Bishkek formula of the Bishkek
influence i
short intermezzo in the german
language:
So, das genügt, diese einfache
Beschreibung der Relativität erklärt daß
v Fotonen < v Neutrinos < c
absolut & Higgs ~ 126 GeV/c2 nur so erscheint
Die Theorie mit Bosonen, GLuonen ist
nur eine Komplexe Beschreibung der Messdaten.
Higgs ist nur ein Teil der
"Puzzle" an sich wieder ein "Puzzle"
Die "Bishkek" Beschreibung,
erklärt auch die "Red Shift" ohne "Big Bang
Die 95% "dunkle" Masse und
Energie braucht es nicht.
„Universität Stadt?? RelativitätsFormel
und Beschreibung“ ?
Ist nur Frage welche Universität /
Physikabteilung eine Bewertungsbereitschaft umsetzen will.
einfach -- i = 1 – [v]/c
Erstaunlich wie eine einfache Formell
und Erklärung, die "Kyrgystan - TU Stadt ?? Beschreibung", die Relativität und eine Erklärung für die
neue CERN HLC Befunde und astronomische Befunde umfassen. Zu einfach um durch
die Wissenschaftler im Betracht genommen zu werden. Es wurde nicht erwartet daß
so schnell neue Befunde (mit der CERN HLC) die Bishkek Formel unterstützen
wurden. Es wurde nur erwartet daß eine einfache Formel und Erklärung erwünscht
wären. Schade, es könnte die Relativität für vielfach mehr Leute verständlich
und geliebt machen.
neutrino’s, auf dem Wege nach erweiterte Ansichten
Einer weitere einfache Gedankenanstoß :
Die Geschwindigkeit der Neutrino’s
könnte sich zwischen der Photonengeschwindigkeit und – c - befinden. Dieser
Geschwindigkeitsbereich ist dargestellt in hundert Tausenden Kilometer je
Sekunde im Verhältnis zur –c – gering aber in physischen Ansichten ist dieser
Bereich unbegrenzt groß, gemäß der Relativitätstheorie. Bestimmt sind Teilchen
existent mit Geschwindigkeiten noch näher an – c – derer Detektierung sich
nicht erzielen lässt, gemäß der Relativitätstheorie (“unsichtbare” Teilchen /
Masse). In der physisch unbegrenzt großen Geschwindigkeitsbereich “nah” am – c
– könnte sich eine unbegrenzt große Menge befinden ; die vermutete “dunkele”
Masse und noch viel mehr.
Dies sei gemäß meinen einfachen
Stellungnahmen, die ich Anfang 2010 selbst veröffentlicht habe. Gemäß dieser
Stellungnahme ist die Geschwindigkeit der Hochgeschwindigkeitsteilchen nur im
begrenzten Zeitrahmen als unveränderlich zu betrachten. Im Kosmischen
Zeitrahmen sollte die Geschwindigkeit abnehmen. Die Geschwindigkeitsabnahme sei
nur mittelbar zeitmäßig vorgegeben, unmittelbar durch die Massendichte des
durchquerten Raums, während Strecke und Zeit änderlich und je geringer je näher
die Geschwindigkeit an – c -, gemäß der Relativitätstheorie. Somit könnte sich
einer große Materiemengeanteil im Geschwindigkeitsbereich „nah“ an – c –
befinden.
another
wake-up call, the Eleonorazone
--10--
the Eleonorazone, infinite
„density“ & time
i = 1 – [v]/c v<c
i = interaction, influence
m is matter, without
NN = m it is possible to
understand more. Probably x = 1
NN = m/i
,, NN = mass appearance
,, v =
velocity of matter, particles
the Bishkek
formula of the Bishkek influence i
v à c
; i à 0
; NN à infinite
the Newtonzone is the other zone with the
large values of (c-v)
the Eleozone
is the zone with the tiny values for (c-v)
The Eleozone is tiny, compared to the Newtonzone, expressed in values of (c-v).
The Newtonzone is tiny, compared to the Eleozone, expressed in values of NN.
The Eleozone is infinite huge, compared to the
Newtonzone, expressed in values of NN.
The values of influence – i – are tiny in the Eleozone.
An infinite amount of matter – m- can exist with infinite small – i –,
without being noticed.
introduction of MM = m * i (m times i )
In the Newtonzone F = (m * l /t)/t hence m = F
* t * t /l kg = N * s * s/m
In the Newtonzone (c-v) ~=c, i ~=1,
{ i = 1 – [v]/c = 1} MM=m
In the Eleozone (c-v) à0, i à0
In the Eleozone with, for example, i = 1 yotto, m can be 1 yotta, with the
same MM.
Also, with i = 10E(-yotta), m can be
10E(yotta),
with the same amount of MM.
Also, with i = 10E(10E(-yotta), m can be
10E(10E(yotta),
with the same MM.
An infinite amount of – m – can be stashed in the Eleozone
while we observe limited MM.
At present some scientists consider the proportions between known &
“dark” matter to be 15 versus 85. With this MM(85), the amount of –
m – in the Eleozone related
to this MM(85) can be infinite, in particular in the “high” range of the Eleozone next to
–c-
A continuation on this theory is that the amount of – m - with tiny – i - is infinite large
and that the density of - m - is infinite high, in the “high”range
of the Eleozone.
That is possible because the – MM
– that relates to our observations
remains limited.
Infinite matter can be “stashed, compressed” into the Eleonorazone.
The Bishkek-formulation presents an opening of understanding that
neutron’s might be slightly faster than photons.
Aditionally the Eleonora-theory
presents an opening of understanding
that the recent “Delft-observations” might be indicating some unknown kind of
reality. All kinds of still unknown relations eg
interactions are to be expected, because of the infinite high - m - density.
Relations eg
a kind of “invisible” “bond eg string” can continu to exist after a distance has been introduced between
a particular pair of particular tiny objects (the “Delft-observations”).
Notice that the forces eg influence by the
electrostatic, electromagnetic and gravity fields have also been considered
very “invisible” and “magic” in the past, as was dna.
The Bishkek-formulation and Eleozone theory
indicate that there might be infinite more alike.
Relativity and quantum physics science might be just only at its first
steps.
Byond the Higgs-particle there might be
infinite more to be discovered and be used.
Probably it could use a kind of huge accelerator to discover much more.
Germany could finance this huge accelerator in Thueringen
or Sachsen. There it can be realized much more cost-efficient than at the
present location of Cern. Real cost-efficient
internationalization would be the realization in Russia, for example in the Ufa
or Tver-region. Germany could finance by importing
additional natural gas.
Most honest would be the realization near Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan,
reasonably neutral and the center of the world-population.
start-note about time-relativity
Its according to the Bishkek formel that
travelers age less. The influence – i - becomes less when the – v – goes nearer
to – c - and the time seems to be
slower.
It needs influence for aging. Aging takes more time with less influence,
eg, regarded with the rate of aging less time seems
to have passed, eg time seems to have slowed.
introduction of TT = t * i (t times i )
In the Newtonzone F = (m * l /t)/t hence
m = F * t * t /l kg = N * s *
s/m
In the Newtonzone (c-v) ~=c, i ~=1,
{ i = 1 – [v]/c = 1} TT=t
In the Eleozone (c-v) à0, i à0
In the Eleozone with, for example, i = 1 yotto, t can be 1 yotta, with the same TT.
Also, with i = 10E(-yotta), t can be 10E(yotta), with the
same amount of TT.
Also, with i = 10E(10E(-yotta), t can be
10E(10E(yotta),
with the same TT.
An infinite amount of – t – can be stashed in the Eleozone
while we observe limited TT.
A continuation on this theory is that the amount of – t -
with tiny – i - is infinite large
and that the density of - t -
is infinite high, in the “high”range of the Eleozone.
That is possible because the –
TT – that relates to our observations
remains limited.
Something can go deep into the Eleonorazone
near – c - , be there for ten billion years – t - of our time in the Newtonzone and come back to us only one second TT older out
of the Eleozone.
The time-relativity states that time seems slower in the Eleonorazone near the absolute speed –c- .The available time increases with the depth
into the Eleozone near the absolute speed –c- .There
seems infinite time available for all processes and everything at the infinite
depth infinite near to –c- in the Eleonorazone. The
time-frame at the end of the Eleonorazone is infinite
large.
Infinite time can be “stashed” into the Eleonorazone.
Distance is a product of speed and time;
l = v*t , l = c*t
The length, area and volume frames seem infinite large when the timeframe
seems infinite large. This cohers with and supports
the possibility of infinite “density” in the Eleozone.
Infinite volume can be “stashed” into the Eleonorazone.
infinite matter eg “density”, time, volume, in
the Eleozone
infinite of all in the Eleozone
The probability theory states that there is everything (possible), every
occurrence in the Eleozone because there is infinite
of all.
The Eleozone is everywhere around us and in us.
--11-- more about the Eleozone.
An implication of the Eleonora-theory and the
Bishkek-formulation.
The Bishkek influence – i – is very small when – v – is very near to – c- .
It has been discussed that matter – m – with
high radial speed – v - travels
through space with matter with lower speeds and looses
speed by the drag of the matter with lower speeds.
The Bishkek-formulation i = 1 – [v]/c presents that the drag is less when the
speed is near – c - ,because
the influence – i - is
less.
Hence, the loss of speed of matter – m – is very slow when its speed is very near – c - .
The probability of existence of matter with speeds nearer to – c - is higher than the probability of matter with
speeds that are less near to – c -.
This implicates that there could be an infinite amount of matter –m- with
its speed infinite close to – c - and
hence infinite small – i -
and limited MM.
Not only would the geometric dimensions of the universe be infinite,
also its density of – m – would be infinite, together with the range
of NN.
some properties of this matter –
m - in infinite density
The influence – i - of this matter – m - is infinite small, the loss of its speed is
infinite slow and the tendency of its conglomeration is infinite slow. The
probability is higher that the matter – m - in
the Eleozone is an uniform”soup”,
on the scale of the Gigalightyears that is known at
present.
Anything in our Newtonzone has little
influence on anything in the Eleozone because – i - is
very small in the Eleozone and the amount of – m - in the
Newtonzone is very small compared to the amount of – m - in the Eleozone.
This supports the recent “Delft-observations” as mentioned above.
about neutrino’s
Probably “discrete” assumptions about neutrino’s should be abandoned.
The Bishkek-formula and Eleonora-theory
implicate that two particles which we both name neutrino’s, can be very
different, the one having a pico (c-v) and – i - of the
other and a pica – m -, but with about the same NN and MM that
is being observed by us.
The range of (c-v) of the Eleozone is
small but the range of NN is infinite large.
The understanding that neutrino’s are not with
a discrete value, rises questions about the discrete
value of – c -. It would be the sole with a discrete value in
physics, in particular at the end of the Eleozone.
--12-- i = ((c – [v])/c)x
à i =
1 – [v]/c
i = ((c – [v])/c)x ,NN=m/i
,MM = m * i
MM = NN * i * i = ((c – [v])/c)2x
*NN =
= (c2 - 2[v] + [v]2/c2)x
*NN
with v àc
MM ~= c2x * NN
yes, with x=1 MM = c2
NN
aligning to E = mc2
concludes that x=1 and i = 1
– [v]/c
The implication is that E=mc2 as well as
the Bishkek-formula and the Eleonora-theory,
all three support each other.
The Bishkek-formula and Eleonora-theory above should
be studied once again to reconsider that really x=1 or not.
--13-- the black holes recycle from the Newtonzone
to the Eleonorazone
The attentive reader will comment that the Eleozone
will degrade itself: The particles with speed in all (opposing) directions will
slow each other. The matter will drag itself into the Newtonzone.
Though this will be a very slow process because the influence - i -
is very tiny in the Eleozone where the
particles move with speeds – v - very
near to - c -.
Recall; i = 1 – [v]/c with v à c
c-v à 0
i à 0
However: -- The claimed high
probability of a high density of –m- in
the Eleozone would result into a considerable drag.
–- On the cosmic timescale of billions of years, the drag would result into a
shift of everything into the Newtonzone. At the very
end everything would have a speed zero and an absolute collaps
would result.
Here the black holes come in very handy to support the idea that the
existence of everything together (“the cosmic system”) is infinite.
Black holes are area’s of concentration and
contraction. As claimed above, it needs a reduction of the average -v- inside,
to enable the contraction. Black holes do exactly that and emit radiation with
high energy along their axis in the radial direction. Specificly
is being emitted with a radial component. The matter that remains in the black
hole has a lower -v- average
speed. The black holes (have to)
redistribute and emit with high energy, to continue their existence of
absorbing more matter in a small area eg concentrating
and contracting matter.
Matter with a lower average speed
-v- and higher influence -i- remains
in the black hole and strengthens it and
matter with -v- close to
–c- and an
–i- close to zero,
is being sent back along the
axis, way into the Eleonorazone.
Already during decades there is acceptance of the concept of emitting
energetic radiation along with contracting orbits eg
changes of internal (tangential) speed. The models about the emittance of light mention the emittance
of light-quants along with a model of orbiting electrons changing to “lower” eg smaller orbits around the atomic nucleus. The electrons
are being mentioned to alter to a lower level of energy and the reduction of
their energy is mentioned to be corresponding with the energy of the emitted
light.
Not only does the black hole accumulate matter -m-
but also the influence -i- of each amount of matter is being increased.
This increases the capability of emitting with –v- nearer to –c- and
hence with smaller influence –i- and
less possible to be observed. The
higher grade of –i- in a heavier and compacter black hole
captures the matter longer, until it gains a smaller –i- with
a –v- nearer to
–c- .There is more “upgrading” to “higher”
levels towards the “high- range” of the Eleozone,
before emittance.
A mature black hole presumably predominantly emits in the range of the Eleozone that is nearer to
–c- . This radiation, eg
the “high” range of the Eleozone can
not be observed by us because it has a very minimal influence –i- .
A black hole first drains the Newtonzone in a
larger and larger geometric sphere around it.
During the proces it increases its amount of
matter –m- and
-i-
This increases its capability to drain from the Eleozone
in the spheric area around.
The maturing of the black hole raises its capability to drain from the
“higher” ranges of the Eleozone where the influence
–i- is smaller.
The maturing also improves the “upgrading” by the black hole, as
mentioned above.
The “upgrading” shifts towards the “higher” ranges of the Eleozone during maturing.
The black hole itself rises in the Eleozone
during maturing and “disappears” beyond are observation-capabilities.
Another property of black holes is their higher probability to be born
and to grow faster where there is more “slow” matter around in the Newtonzone. Here we notice another balancing.
It can also be noticed that black holes are transformers into radial
radiation along their axis. This is another balancing. The speed –v- that is essential for the matter –m- to
occupy eg create volume is given back to the
surroundings.
The Bishkek formula and Eleonora theory
conclude that black holes are not big guzzlers where everything disappears for
infinite but are essential recyclers, reprocessors,
upgraders.
It can be concluded that black holes are essential contributors to the
infinite existence of not only the Eleozone but also the
balances between the ranges and the infinite existence of the Newtonzone also. Without black holes, all the matter would
drag each other to a zero speed and an absolute collaps
into nothing.
The recycling self-reproducing
universe has a infinite higher probability of
existence than a once-through system. That is also the reason for the existence
of life and all kinds of arranged systems and appearances that seem to be of
discrete value, such as protons, neutrons, electrons and other quantum-particles.
--14-- the “Bishkek-formula and Eleonorazone” confirm God
There is infinite of all (conceiled) in the Eleozone,
infinite “density” eg matter, time and volume.
The probability theory states
that there is everything (possible), every occurrence in the Eleozone because there is infinite of all.
The Eleozone
is everywhere around us and in us.
God is everywhere around us
and in us, byond our observation.
The influence – i – in the Eleozone ranges down to infinite small.
However there is influence
from the Eleozone on us in the Newtonzone
because there is infinite of all in the Eleozone, byond our observation.
God is byond
our observations and influences us.
The time-relativity is also
interesting.
Jesus left into the Eleonorazone and can return only a fraction of a second
older.
Six billion years for us can
be as little as only six days for God in the Eleozone,
the part of God somewhere in the Eleozone that
created the sun, earth and us.
Gost appearances and miracles out of the Eleozone are possible.
Our spirits can come out of
and return to the Eleozone (heaven).
--15-- about the autor of
the Bishkek-formulation and Eleonora-zone theory
This conclusion by the autor of the
Bishkek-formulation is not a conclusion by a person who has a life with the
heavy brainwork in the world of the difficult science of fundamental (astro)physics. The autor did also
spent time on concepts for cheap transport and storage of natural gas and cheap
generation of electricity, and developed knowledge about (international) law,
politics, financials, economics, environmental issues, etc. Even reduction of
CO2 emissions down to zero, will do little to reduce the rise of the
atmospheric CO2 concentration.
The autor whitnessed
about the ESM to the german federal constitutional
court in 2012. The Bundesverfassungsgericht BVerfG has pointed (12th September 2012) the constitutional
prohibition of the unlimited liability (ten trillion euro and byond) of Germany by the ESM.
The autor of the Bishkek-formulation is a
multiple master of engineering in practical applications of engineering and,
with his level of understanding of macro–politics, -psychology, -sociology,
-communication, -economy and –finance, publishes about actual issues such as
the euro- and bankingcrisis and the possible
solutions. The only correct approach to the so called eurocrisis
will generate ten trillion euro for Germany. The spending of just a fraction of
those trillions on the improvement of international relations and fundamental
research will generate huge advantages for Germany.
Please notice that NN = m/i
with i = ((c – [v])/c)x
is somehow being mentioned in the manuscripts of the Einstein and/or
Lorentz. No one should in any way
pretend to be the autor of any part of this publication and/or its contents. This publication exists since 22 feb 2010.
Einstein became populair with his field
equations around the relativity theory which mystified it for almost all people.
Rumors continue, that someone close to Einstein has written the field
equations. However, with the field equations he encouraged many to try to
understand advanced mathematics but also encouraged many to write things down
with advanced mathematics, without basic understanding. Above all, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz published about
the relativity theory one year earlier, as Einstein has admitted, and before
Henri Poincare already published about the relativity theory.
The author of the Bishkek-formulation and Eleonora
theory origins from Winschoten, originally pre-Germany,
now the NE-corner of the tiny Netherlands. The area around Winschoten,
Skyland, belonged to pre-Germany. This moor-region was
hardly accessible in the past and has been incorporated into the
pre-Netherlands because it was not valid much attention of the pre-german rulers. –Van der Veen-
translates as –originating from the moor- eg -moorman-. The fathers homeland Skyland,
has been looted by the gang in the Hague. It was an important contribution to
the secret estimated two trillion Euro of dutch royal
wealth at present *. Every inhabitant of Skyland had
twenty million value of natural gas under his house. At present only four
million is left and is also being looted in a hurry, instead of wise import of russian natural gas.
Skyland should be added to Germany. Then Skyland would be reliable to become the storage of three
trillion cubic meters of imported natural gas for Germany and its neighbors.
That would be sufficient for years and natural gas can rapidly become a
sustainable substitute for coal and oil.
Transfer of Skyland to Germany would also be
much better for the inhabitants of Skyland.
* Queen Emma was the worlds first female
dollar billionaire, a century ago. The usual average return on large wealth in
the past century has been 8%. Cumulative that calculates to two trillion
dollars at present. Special dutch (tax) laws protect
the secrecy. The dutch royal wealth is being exempted
from tax. So it is allowed to keep the dutch royal
wealth secret for the tax office and everyone and ly
to the people that it is only a few hundred million, which is thousands times
less.
The dutch royal wealth of two trillion dollars
is being kept secret in the “Emma zone”.
The british royal wealth and the Belgium royal
wealth are also huge and kept secret.